Help With Assignments

Got confusion or query ???

Looking for customized, unused and Plagiarism free solutions ???

Submit your assignment here

.00

Keywords

The University of Melbourne
Department of Accounting
GROUP ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET
This form must be attached to all submitted work with all sections completed via the TURNITIN on the Learning Management System of this subject. An incomplete form may result in the delayed return of your assignment or of your mark for the assignment. Please keep a copy of all assignments before submitting them for assessment.
Subject Code:ACCT 10002 Subject Name:Introductory Financial Accounting
Tutorial Day/Time: Tutor Name:
Assignment Name: Case Study 2Qantas Airways Ltd and Singapore Airlines Ltd
 Student ID Number Student Name (in full)

Assignment Due Date: Thursday 26thSeptember 2013 by 11.00pm
Submission mode: Electronically PDF Format via TURNITIN in theLearning Management
 System
Ensure you have completed all sections of this cover sheet including your tutor’s name, student ID numbers and your full student names. Incomplete or incorrect completion of this cover sheet may result in the assignment being subject to penalties as they apply to late submission (see below).
Penalties will apply for late or incorrect submission at the rate of 10% per day or part thereof.
Students are advised to retain a copy of their assignments.
Rationale:
The rationale for this assignment is for students to investigate, analyse and report on the topic of Property, Plant & Equipment that encompasses depreciation.
Suggested support material is Australian Accounting Standard AASB 116 Property, Plant & Equipment.
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/AASB116_07-04_COMPjun09_07-09.pdf
Instructions:
1. Answer the four questions provided. All questions should be clearly identified. No question should be in point form and your response should be in complete sentences.
2. Answers should be detailed.
3. Where analytical evidence needs to be provided, students need to include an appendix of all calculations.
4. Bibliography – Reference style APA 6th http://www.lib.unimelb.edu.au/recite/citations/apa6/generalNotes.html
Word Count:
Fifteen hundred (1,600) words. If the word count is greater than what is stated in the assessment, a penalty of 5% will be incurred.
Assignment Mark Allocation: 15%
• Please refer to the Marking Rubric.
• The Marking Rubric will be placed on the IFA1 LMS page so that you can check at any time the marking criteria.
• Marks will be allocated according to the marking rubric and this assignment will be marked on line via TURNITIN.
Submission:
Very Important:
For Case Study 2, only one submission is required per group. Only one student submits the assessment, Case Study 2 – Qantas and Singapore Airlines.
The student who does not submit the assignment WILL NOT BE ABLE to view the submission under TURNITIN. It is essential that the student who submits the assignment downloads the final feedback and grade and gives access to that information to their partner. If this does not take place, then only one student will be able to view the grade and feedback.
Case Study 2: Qantas Airways Ltd and Singapore Airlines Ltd
This comparative study of accounting policies adopted by two international airlines for the depreciation of aircraft, spares and spare engines provides an insight into the differences in accounting policy that may emerge, even when accounting practice in the jurisdictions involved is regulated.
Key concepts involved are as follows:
• Non-current assets
• Depreciable amount
• Depreciation
• Useful life
• Comparability of results
• Financial statement analysis
Qantas Airways Ltd (Qantas) and Singapore Airlines Ltd (Singapore) both operate in the international aviation industry. The former is Australia’s largest airline, having been formed in 1920 in outback Queensland as the Queensland and Northern Territory Aerial Service Ltd (now Qantas). Singapore was formed in 1972, although its origins date back to 1947, and is based in south-east Asia, operating from the city-state of Singapore at the Changi Airport.
Both companies operate diverse airline fleet. Aircraft, spares and spare engines collectively constitute a major asset of such corporations as is demonstrated by reference to the 2011 statements of financial position of these two companies. In the case of Qantas, this non-current asset, shown as ‘Property, Plant and Equipment’ at the stated carrying value of AUD$9753.7 million as at 30 June 2011. For Singapore, this ‘fixed’ asset category, disclosed as ‘Aircraft, spares and spare engines’ at a carrying value of S$12464.5 million, constituted 62.4 per cent of total group assets as at 31 March 2011of S$19990 million. Accordingly, the accounting policies adopted in depreciating such assets over their useful lives assume importance in assessing the financial performance and position of airline operators.
In the case of Qantas, the ‘Depreciation and amortisation’ policy for aircraft, spares and spare engines was disclosed in Note 1(n) for the ‘Notes to the financial statements’ for the year ending 30 June 2011. The relevant portion of this note is reproduced below:
Depreciation (Qantas)
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis on all items of property, plant and equipment except for freehold and leasehold land. The depreciation rates of owned assets are calculated so as to allocate the costs or valuation of an asset, less any estimated residual value, over the asset’s estimated useful life to the Qantas Group. Assets are depreciated or amortised from the date of acquisition or, in respect of internally constructed assets, from the time an asset is completed and held ready for use. The costs of improvements to assets are depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset or the estimated life of the improvement whichever is shorter. Assets under finance lease are amortised over the term of the relevant lease or, where it is likely the Qantas Group will obtain ownership of the asset, the life of the asset.
The principal asset depreciation and amortisation periods and estimated residual value percentages are:
 Years Residual Value %
Jet Aircraft and engines 20 0-20
Non-jet Aircraft and engines 10-20 0-20
Aircraft spare parts 15-20 0-20
These rates are in line with those for the previous year, with the exception of the residual value assumption on wide-bodied aircraft, which was revised from 25% to 20%.
Depreciation rates and amortisation rates and residual values are reviewed annually and reassessed having regard to commercial and technological developments and the estimated useful life of assets to the Qantas Group.
On the other hand Singapore reported its policy to the ‘Depreciation of fixed assets’ at Note 2(g), entitled ‘Accounting policies’. The portion of this note pertaining to aircraft, spares and spare engines is reproduced hereunder:
Depreciation of Fixed Assets (Singapore)
Fixed assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis at rates that are calculated to depreciate their cost to their estimated residual values at the end of their operational lives. Operational lives and residual values are reviewed annually in light of experience and changing circumstances.
Fully depreciated assets are retained in the financial statements until they are no longer in use. No depreciation is charged after assets are depreciated to their residual values.
Aircraft Fleet
The following table gives information relating to Singapore’s calculation of useful life and residual values of its aircraft fleet and associated spare parts.
 Years Residual Value %
Passenger Jet Aircraft (New) 15 10
Freighter Aircraft (New) 15 20
Please Note:
AUD = Australian Dollars
S = Singapore Dollars
Qantas Airways Ltd 2011 Financial Report
http://www.qantas.com.au/infodetail/about/investors/2011AnnualReport.pdf
Singapore Airline Ltd 2011 Financial Report
http://www.singaporeair.com/pdf/Investor-Relations/Annual-Report/annualreport1011.pdf

Required:
Students need to address the following Case Study 2 questions.
1. Compare and contrast the depreciation accounting policies of Qantas and Singapore for the years ended 30 June 2011 and 31 March 2011 respectively and comment on the comparability of the results reported.
2. What guidance is provided under relevant accounting pronouncements (standards, policies, legislation) in estimating useful lives and salvage values of long-lived assets (such as jet aircrafts).
What key aspects must companies keep on mind when estimating these useful lives and salvage values?
3. What would be the impact, on Qantas’s financial reports, and on you as a potential investor comparing Qantas’ performance with that of Singapore, if Qantas used the reducing balance method of depreciation instead of the straight-line method?
4. Qantas has recently acquired the Airbus A380, the biggest passenger jet ever built. Different from other aircraft in Qantas’ fleet, the Airbus A380 uses composite materials (such as carbon-fibre reinforced plastic) for greater durability of its airframe. The engines that provide the necessary thrust are also newer, more powerful variants of their predecessors used on planes in Qantas’ existing fleet.
Given the information above, answer the following questions;
a). What difficulties may Qantas face in estimating the useful life and salvage value of the Airbus A380?
b). What information, as a user of financial statements, would you want about this acquisition in the financial reports, if any at all?

Question Set #103

Views: 479
Word Count: 1787 words including References
File Format: Microsoft Word Document
Editable: Yes

Attachment: Click here to download